#AmazonFail
Apr. 12th, 2009 07:45 pmSo, Amazon.com has apparently decided that any book with gay or lesbian content is “adult” material and should be stricken from their sales rankings “In consideration of our entire customer base” (emphasis mine, but words from Amazon.com member services). Because we certainly wouldn’t want to create the impression that fiction or non-fiction portraying gay or lesbian people in a positive light (or, you know, at all) is popular or anything, and I’m sure every Amazon.com customer appreciates being protected from such “adult” content.
Needless to say, Amazon needs to continue to get an earful (and an inbox full) about how such censorship is unacceptable. You can find the petition to protest Amazon’s new “adult” policy on thepetitionsite.com.
Needless to say, Amazon needs to continue to get an earful (and an inbox full) about how such censorship is unacceptable. You can find the petition to protest Amazon’s new “adult” policy on thepetitionsite.com.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 01:35 am (UTC)Let us know if you hear of anything else. Online petitions are notoriously useless, and this one doesn't say how or even if it plans to get the petition to Amazon. What works is flooding their snail- or e-mail inboxes and phone lines. And of course, and actual boycott there's some support.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 01:43 am (UTC)http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6651080.html
I wonder how they'd respond to seeing the response linked above, tho. Hmm.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 01:50 am (UTC)I've already e-mailed, myself.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 02:12 am (UTC)Have also run across this:
> This is the email addy you get after slogging through
> all the online barriers: connect-help@amazon.com
no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 10:09 am (UTC)Witchcraft and homosexual relations, it's surely making some Amazon warehouse worker writhe on the floor.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 12:43 pm (UTC)Grrr.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-13 05:50 pm (UTC)*notes year is 2009 and not, say, 1959*
*is disgusted*
no subject
Date: 2009-04-14 01:23 am (UTC)I *just* did a news search and came up with the news that an Amazon representative told Wired, "This is an embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloging error for a company that prides itself on offering complete selection." There is also a hacker claiming responsibility, and no one seems to be sure where the truth lies yet.
See full story on Wired.com (http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/hacker-claims-c.html)