Casino Royale
Nov. 17th, 2006 10:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The James Bond of my childhood was the campy Roger Moore Bond of films like Moonraker and The Spy Who Loved Me (the first Bond film I saw). Later, I became a fan of Connery's Bond (and George Lazenby's), suffered through Timothy Dalton's, and for the most part enjoyed Pierce Brosnan in the role. Daniel Craig's hiring as the new 007 was controversial (largely due to his hair color, it seems, which didn't bother me at all) but I've got to say, having just seen him in Casino Royale, Craig gets it, and how.
This was a good Bond movie. The gadgetry is at a bare minimum (ironically much of it is also entirely real — Connery's Bond only wished he had a cell and a laptop at his disposal). Craig's Bond is dry and witty without self-conscious jokes and, while handsome, he's not as pretty as past Bonds, putting him more in line with Flemming's stories. Dame Judi Dench does another lovely turn as M, with a bigger part (yay!) but not so big as to detract from the main story. I won't spoil the story except to say that I thought at one point, "Wow, character development in a Bond film: what will they think of next?"
This was a good Bond movie. The gadgetry is at a bare minimum (ironically much of it is also entirely real — Connery's Bond only wished he had a cell and a laptop at his disposal). Craig's Bond is dry and witty without self-conscious jokes and, while handsome, he's not as pretty as past Bonds, putting him more in line with Flemming's stories. Dame Judi Dench does another lovely turn as M, with a bigger part (yay!) but not so big as to detract from the main story. I won't spoil the story except to say that I thought at one point, "Wow, character development in a Bond film: what will they think of next?"
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 03:44 pm (UTC)I shall try to see it tomorrow.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-19 07:42 pm (UTC)