3G iPhone & MobileMe
Jun. 11th, 2008 09:34 amApple’s announcement of the release of the 3G iPhone, with a starting price of $199 for the 8 GB model, may be the final push needed to get me to buy an iPhone (since the price-tag is pretty much the only thing that kept me from getting one thus far). Funny thing is, up until now, I’d been seriously looking at the iPod Touch, which is basically an iPhone without the phone because: 1) I’ve got a cell phone account with Sprint and the iPhone is still exclusive with AT&T Wireless, and; 2) I don’t really care that much about talking on the phone, I want the e-mail, web, and A/V capabilities of the thing and don’t care much about the phone. But now the 8 GB iPhone will be $100 less than the 8 GB iPod Touch, unless iPod prices drop as well.
On the flip side, I’m not too happy to learn that Apple’s MobileMe replacement for their .Mac service will no longer support synching with OS 10.3, which is what I’ve got on my G3 iBook. The iBook won’t run 10.5 (needs G4 or higher) so I need to “upgrade” it to 10.4, which is outdated, get a new laptop (which ain’t gonna happen unless a large chunk of money drops into my lap), or just live with not being able to sync my address book, calendar, and such. Of course, if I get a 3G iPhone, then I can sync all of that information on it and not worry about having it on the laptop... Hmmm...
On the flip side, I’m not too happy to learn that Apple’s MobileMe replacement for their .Mac service will no longer support synching with OS 10.3, which is what I’ve got on my G3 iBook. The iBook won’t run 10.5 (needs G4 or higher) so I need to “upgrade” it to 10.4, which is outdated, get a new laptop (which ain’t gonna happen unless a large chunk of money drops into my lap), or just live with not being able to sync my address book, calendar, and such. Of course, if I get a 3G iPhone, then I can sync all of that information on it and not worry about having it on the laptop... Hmmm...
no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 02:26 pm (UTC)Mind you, I'm probably going to be getting one myself, truth be told, but that is a bit spendier with all considerations.
Joe
no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 04:03 pm (UTC)For example, just because you can push bits faster through the cell network, doesn't mean you're suddenly miraculously pushing less bits. Wider pipe doesn't mean cheaper pipe. And there's a lot about the new infrastructure building up around the iPhone that seems to indicate to me that people will be pushing more bits through the ether not less. (Can you configure mobileMe syncing to occur only when you're in WiFi coverage, frex? I sure hope so...)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 04:03 pm (UTC)They have to drop the price or do _something_ to make the touch worth the price (possibly a much larger SSD or something - we'll see).
All in all, however, the iPhone 3G is pretty sexay.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 04:48 pm (UTC)Also, presumably, you can't get an iPhone without buying a service plan? So you are paying full price for the phone; you've just hidden the cost in the service contract. (At least, Canada's Apple doesn't directly sell iPhones; you'll have to go to the carriers for it.)
I suspect that they won't measurably drop the price on the iPodTouch; after all, if they did that, it could have nasty pricing ripple down effects on their entire iPod line. If you could get an 8GB Touch for 200 bucks, why the heck would anyone buy a Nano for 150?. Or, more to the point, why would anyone purchase an iPod classic? Only serious folk really need 80GB of media storage, I suspect. Of course, one of the compelling reasons to purchase an iPod classic, if you put your music into heavy rotation, is the absolute write-lifetimes of the flash memory that's used for storage in the nano and touch...
no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-18 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 03:59 pm (UTC)Come on, Apple; hurry up and purchase Adobe, already, and then release a Darwin, or Carbonized, version of Frame! (pipe dream, I know)
I don't really mind switching to Pages for new small projects, or Word for work stuff when I have to use it, or the other "writing tools" at my disposal (Scribus, frex).
But I have legacy content in Frame it would be nice to have access to, and gradually convert over to a more modern and portable format.