MacPorn

Oct. 15th, 2008 02:26 pm
stevekenson: (apple)
[personal profile] stevekenson
Ooo, daddy likes...

The new MacBook

Date: 2008-10-15 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gryphonrose.livejournal.com
That's very VERY pretty.

Date: 2008-10-15 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sintheticphylum.livejournal.com
It's very pretty, but I think I'll stick with my PC... I play too many games, and don't do enough of the thing that Macs are good at to switch.

Date: 2008-10-15 07:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wyldelf.livejournal.com
Yeah, if you're not interested in the Mac toys, there's not much reason to switch - the OS being awesome-sauce probably isn't enough of a tipping point unless you are a tech geek like me. But as a hard core gamer also, my next desktop is likely to be a Mac Pro. I'll Boot Camp for PC only games and have Mac OSX for all other apps.

Date: 2008-10-16 12:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unseelie23.livejournal.com
Not that I would expect a serious PC gamer to switch, but the video performance on the new MacBook in Windows is quite impressive. Compared to the previous MacBook using Intel Integrated Graphics it's about a 7x improvement.

With the last MacBook you couldn't even install Crysis. With the current one it runs and is playable with all settings at medium.

Quite impressive for integrated graphics.
Edited Date: 2008-10-16 12:07 am (UTC)

Quite impressive for integrated graphics.

Date: 2008-10-16 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sintheticphylum.livejournal.com
See, there's the nasty word that REALLY turns me off for Macs; INTEGRATED. I really don't like the idea that I'd be stuck with the specs that someone else decided were appropriate for my computer. I much prefer being able to crack that baby open and modify her to what I WANT. I like to tinker. I've heard that some Mac desktops are getting better about that, but they're still not up to the same level as PC's for customization.



Also, I'm on a limited enough budget that I couldn't afford a Mac, even if I wanted one! :)

Re: Quite impressive for integrated graphics.

Date: 2008-10-16 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unseelie23.livejournal.com
Oh, I agree... discrete graphics is always preferrable but it's not like laptop video can generally be upgraded even when it is discrete. For what it's worth, only the MacBooks and the Mac Mini use integrated graphics. Everything else is discrete graphics, but only the MacPro is really upgradable... which maps to PCs as well: laptop and all-in-one video generally can't be upgraded, and towers can be.

The current Mac tower allows (physically) for the video cards to be changed almost as easily as a PC. The problem is you need to make sure that said replacement card a) supports EFI instead of or in addition to BIOS, and b) has Mac drivers. That's only if you expect the card to support the Mac OS of course. If all you care about is Windows (via Boot Camp), it'll just work.

I suspect the EFI support issue will become less and less of an issue as Vista (or Windows 7 down the road) becomes more common, because MS is supporting EFI as of Vista SP1.

Disclaimer: What I do for a living is make Windows run on Apple hardware.
Edited Date: 2008-10-16 12:47 am (UTC)

Date: 2008-10-15 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] defender75.livejournal.com
That is pretty sexy, even for a lifelong pcer like me.

Date: 2008-10-16 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unseelie23.livejournal.com
Xomec, now might be the time to ping Codrus and see if one of us might be able to help you with a discount.

Profile

stevekenson: (Default)
stevekenson

July 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
101112 13141516
1718 1920212223
242526 27282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 3rd, 2026 12:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios