[RPG Theory] Re-Rolls

[stevekenson]

It is resolved: a game mechanic that allows for a re-roll of the dice, especially if it involves expending a limited resource (uses per day, points, etc.) should never result in a worse roll than you started with.

Comments

[adamjury.livejournal.com]

It depends on what the action *is* -- if you're picking a lock and the first roll fails, it doesn't matter if the second one fails worse, the door is still closed. "Going back" to the first roll won't help you.

If you're trying to do something less discrete like repair a car, then a crappy roll that's "good enough" would still take effect even after rolling a worse second roll trying to get the car *really* moving.

A lot of it hinges on how your gaming group [and the game] views rolls -- whether they are for specific actions ["picking the lock"] or entire events ["picking the lock, how close are the guards getting, is there a guard right on the other side of the door, and do we make too much noise while waiting for the lock to get picked?"]

[etherlad.livejournal.com]

Well, I view it less in the context of "make another roll," and more in the context of some power or ability, like an Action Point or whatever, which lets you "cheat fate" and thus reroll.

In terms of making a second roll after the first one fails, I agree with you. In character, you're trying again, with roughly the same chances of success or failure.

[adamjury.livejournal.com]

Well, I view it less in the context of "make another roll," and more in the context of some power or ability, like an Action Point or whatever, which lets you "cheat fate" and thus reroll.

You could then argue that the first roll -- even if it turned out to be the best of the two -- never even existed. ;-)

I'd generally agree that for "fun" purposes, giving the player the best roll of the 2 is the way to go. I don't think it meshes with every group's style of gameplay, though, nor every game.